Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Narrators and Narration - by Victoria, Claudia & Sam.

Narration is a key device in storytelling. The narrator is whom the reader predominantly converses with and relies upon for information. Whether the narrator is in fact reliable can only add to the intrigue!

Through Narration a story unfolds in a certain way, depending on the specific style of narrative. If the narrator is a young child, for example, their telling of the story is limited by their age and inexperience. The motivations of the other characters are revealed secondhand through this biased narrator. Omniscient narration is the opposite. This is the all-knowing narrator, written in the third person – he, she, they. We’re able to understand, through this, every character’s thoughts and feelings as well as any necessary background information. For example, Anna Karenina is told to us through omniscient narration. The story unfolds from Anna's perspective, and equally other perspectives are expressed. Second person narration is used more often in poetry than prose, can be an effective way to engage the reader as it creates a more intimate, personal interaction with the reader by involving them using pronouns – you, your.

Our narrator could also be one with our protagonist, in other words, first person – I, me, mine; as exampled above with the ‘young child’. This style opens our reading experience to the possibility of having an unreliable narrator. An unreliable narrator is a character that we cannot trust, though we must follow their version of events in order to understand anything further. A Clockwork Orange and Fight Club present us with an unreliable narrator, heightening the drama and intriguing us by encouraging tension, thus creating conflict and suspense; marking a successful narrative. According to David Lodge, the purpose of an unreliable narrator is “to reveal in an interesting way the gap between appearance and reality, and to show how human beings distort or conceal the latter”.

A successful narrative prompts questioning which in turn provides suspense. Suspense keeps the reader engaged because of the room given to question. A change in the behavior of a character, or a change of events is a way to encourage narrative tension; this is a result of suspense. Suspense is mainly provided through conflict, for example, imagine a story beginning at funeral where our protagonist is indifferent to the deceased and the other characters are shocked and appalled by this, we may immediately wonder ‘what’s wrong?’ and ‘why is [John] so unaffected?’ Intrigue induced by conflict equals suspense. Win. The graph below depicts the order and affect of causality through intrigue, suspense and tension:

Description: Macintosh HD:Users:Tori:Downloads:11013396_10152723566673671_8951693828814376357_n-2.jpg

The narrative is the progression of the story itself, as clarified by Robert Graham in Creative Writing, narrative is “A sequence of causally related events.” This example is given: “The king died and then the queen died”, this is not a narrative as there has been no cause for affect (causality). However, “the king died and then the queen died of a broken heart” are two related events as one thing has happened due to the other. The significance of causality is that with it, we are able to understand characters through their responses to other characters or events, like the funeral instance.


To create a successful narrative is to create change, by means of intrigue, suspense and tension. Through the plot of the story, we can recognize these three things in our character’s feelings, thoughts and actions. Referring to causality, “A whole is that which has beginning, middle, and end.” (Aristotle) A beginning is that which is causeless, the middle then is caused by the beginning and also causes the end, which is the finally caused but causes nothing further.

No comments:

Post a Comment