Wednesday 25 March 2015

Clichés - Cesar Badillo and Lataisha Elo Fashola

Facts written like fiction presents:
The truth about clichés


 “It is a cliche that most cliches are true, but then like most cliches, that cliche is untrue.”

-Stephen Fry

Over the course of history, there have been many well established influences that have appeared, especially in regards to the creative arts. Clichés being a famously known example of this. It applies to a lot of the creative fields, stretching from film and theatre to art but is very much embedded in literature, in creative writing to be exact. For writers, it is one of the many aspect of creative writing we gain knowledge of but sometimes I wonder, if clichés were a living being and a film or a written piece was made about it, would it be considered a hero or villain in regards to its relationship with writers and its importance within creative writing.

What is the term cliché? And how can you tell what is cliché? Well clichés in way, has its own unchanging, unique and familiar mark. The dictionary definition of it, stated it as “a very predictable or unoriginal thing or person.” Clichés can be a tired phrase like “thinking outside the box” or “the pot calling the kettle black”, it can be an idea like “the good superhero defeats the evil villain” or “the damsel in distress is rescued by her knight in shining armour and they live happily ever after” or even a trope that loses its impact and meaning through repeated use. Therefore in most cases if a cliché is spotted, it’s quickly associated with lazy writing because as soon as we identify this trait, the rest of the works becomes predictable and tasteless. I guess this would make clichés a villains since the definition of the term isn’t encouraging but could this be said to be a fair assessment of clichés?

What about the relationship/partnership between the writer and the uses of clichés? Literature can be said to be the making of it and because of its unchanging nature, the writer can eventually take on a familiar trademark of their own; for example, if you were to pick up a book with a blank cover over it, and as you read it, you begin to see that the story is set in Maine and has a struggling alcoholic as its protagonist, you may soon realise it’s to be a Stephen King novel, simply because it is a style/ theme that is seen repeatedly in some of his works. More than anything, clichés are a tool that can be used to compliment rather than spoil. When a character archetype is overused to the point of becoming a cliché then it seizes to simply be a personality type as it turns into a cliché, potentially adding another layer of significance to the character. It can draw attention and emphasis to the character and make a simple action have a double meaning. Therefore the place setting in Stephen Kings’ novel, Maine could stops being this quiet, normal American state where something strange happens and starts becoming this twilight zone where the supernatural is simply expected. In this sense cliché would then be considered as the hero, seen as its simplicity can provide an easier and shorter expressive tool for the writer but does it really work like that?

The reason clichés work is partly because of our sense of familiarity and association but if it’s repeated too often, it becomes increasingly difficult to suspend disbelief and immerse ourselves in a story because we are simply expecting the unexpected. In conclusion clichés hold a very important part in creative writing as an expressive tool and their relationship with writers is a complex and delicate one, like a double edged sword or unfair lover (see what I did there ^_^). They could either add to the making of a piece or completely destroy it but the outcome of this, I think depends on the way the writer skilfully handles it. And if it was a living being, despite its seamlessly unchanging appearance, clichés could be just as complex as the rest of us, being both the villain and hero at times.

“The reason that clichés become clichés is that they are the hammers and screwdrivers in the toolbox of communication.”
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!




No comments:

Post a Comment